| HOW SHE RATES AMONG
THE GREATS |
 |
| |
Transcript |
| NARRATOR |
Kate
Chopin was an author in a field with many authors. It will be up to scholars,
teachers and students to decide whether Chopin's writing is worthy of their
time for decades and centuries to come. |
| SOUNDBITE |
E.
F. Genovese/Emory University
I think she may last better than Hemingway and Fitzgerald. Welty and Flannery
O'Connor are a little more difficult. They are both very good. I put her
in, probably in a league with them as the leading southern women writers
of the 19th and 20th century, notch below Faulkner, in part because of volume,
in part because of range of subject matter. |
| SOUNDBITE |
Barbara
Ewell/Loyola University (New Orleans)
Chopin's prose is unusual for the period. It's very impressionistic. It's
very clear. It doesn't linger over scenes, and yet, it, it doesn't fail
to give us very vivid images of the context of her characters, of the surroundings
of her characters. But, it never lets those surroundings overtake the character.
It's always her. It's always the individual, the self that she's trying
to explore. |
| SOUNDBITE |
Thomas
Bonner/Xavier University of Louisiana
I think that she belongs to the group of writers of realism and naturalism
of the 1890s in American literature, Crane, Garland, Norris, Dreiser. She
competes favorably with the power of women writers like Willa Cather, Sarah
Orne Jewett for example. Her works have more of a forward-looking stance
than a backward looking stance. In brief, Kate Chopin is a major writer.
|